Before the 2008 downturn in the world’s economies,
globalization of commerce developed at a faster pace than in any time in
history. With the slowing of our
economy, one may wonder whether going global has any positive potential. However, the experience of global
organizations suggests that the global marketplace is still the place to
be. While growth may have slowed in the
“developed” countries, growth and expansion is still taking place in China,
India, Russia, Brazil and other emerging market countries, according to a
recent article in Strategy + Business.
According to authors C. K. Prahalad and Hrishi
Bhattacharyya, the “problem is not globalization, but the way our current
institutions are set up to respond to this new demand. The prevailing corporate operating model does
not work well with the structural changes that have taken place in the global
economy”.
According to the authors, “most companies are still
organized as they were when the market was largely concentrated in the triad of
the old industrialized world: the U.S.,
Europe and Japan”. One of the “most
prevalent and pernicious of these models” is the one where companies follow a
centrally driven operating model, striving to integrate all products and
services for economies of scale. To
achieve this, decision-making, intellectual power and innovation are
concentrated in the home location.
Alternatively, similar companies who wish to achieve locally
relevant distribution systems, strive to decentralize the company and run as
loose federations. This requires
responsibilities for branding and product lineups to be shifted and for
acceptance of trade-offs in cost structures, reduced economy of scale, more
diverse product lines and varying standards of quality and pricing.
Are these the only models for going global? The authors suggest “the time has come to
embrace a new business model that encompasses both the established advantages
of industrial markets and the opportunities of emerging economies. The authors propose a “hub model”: a global corporate structure with no
headquarters. Instead of a single
center, companies would establish core office “hubs” in many or most of the 20
gateway countries in the world that house 70 percent of the world’s population
and account for 80 percent of its income.
The authors explain their model, saying “A hub strategy
enables a company to provide products and services everywhere. But it will not in itself resolve the
trade-offs of globalization…(this requires) a more comprehensive business model
that 1) customizes their products and services in hubs around the world;
2)unites business units around a platform of proprietary knowledge and the
building of competencies, and 3) arbitrages their operating models to gain
cost-effectiveness, productivity and efficiency”.
For the complete article, go to http://www.strategy-business.com/article/11308
No comments:
Post a Comment